We, as Americans, cherish the freedom and right to disagree—which we do, often deeply about important issues that need resolution. But polarization undermines that freedom by tightening prejudices rather than opening thought, thus diminishing the chances for finding resolutions and moving forward. So while polarization may feel like a righteous champion of freedom and right, it is in fact just the opposite—a stick jammed in the spokes of the democratic discourse of freedom. Here are some of the common ways it does it:
- SEDUCES with loaded, heated language and childish name-calling that appeals more to emotion that reason.
- BLINKERS by using cherry-picked facts, and ignoring or mocking opposing arguments and evidence rather than actually addressing them.
- TRIVIALIZES by focusing on “straw-man” issues whose value in re-enforcing biases is clearly greater than their substance.
- BULLIES by making you feel like a dupe or a traitor if you even listen to the other side.
- FLATTERS with language and a tone that makes you feel like an insider, who, of course, agrees with them because you “get it” … just like they do.
- FRIGHTENS by portraying the other side as not just wrong, but a dangerous, evil enemy, replete with wicked hidden agendas.
- “CLANS,” that is, plays the “us vs. them” identity politics game of associating the other view with groups or people (implicitly) “inferior” to “us.”
- “TRIBES” by using the knowing winks and nods of sarcasm, coded language, words in quotes (suggesting they’re misleading) and innuendo which you, as a member of the tribe, of course, will understand without explanation or justification.
This week…we learn how the left hates women, the GOP is white supremacist, liberals are intolerant, the Republicans are liars, liberals are fascists, the right wants to ruin British health care… In short, business as usual. Some have recently argued that instead of trying to depolarize politics, we should fight fire with fire. I appreciate the impulse. But it assumes one side “winning” the game is more important than preserving the game itself…and ignores the possibility that destroying the game may be part of one side’s goal. The game of democracy depends on preserving the rules of discourse. Burning the (other guy’s) house down is tempting. But fire is not so easy to contain.
When reading these examples, check the above list and ask yourself: regardless of whether you agree or disagree, is this really advancing an intelligent resolution through the persuasive, rational arguments of advocacy…or simply fueling the fire of conflict through the divisive, emotional manipulations of polarization?
Here are a few blue and red polarizing headlines from the past week.
The GOP’s White Supremacy Now Has a Smoking Gun
Stupid conservatives keep feeding Trump’s grift with campaign contributions
This is how Republicans get away with their lies: The media lets them do it, again and again
Wingnuts Can No Longer Wave The Flag In Our Faces
Republicans Are Ignoring Climate Change For Money
Ignorant Trump May Be Part Of Right-Wing Plan To Ruin British Healthcare, Too
Republican To Cancer Patients: Buy Street Drugs
GOP Nationalism Shows George Orwell Is More Relevant Than Ever
Study Proves Republican Tax Scam Did NOTHING To Help Average Americans
Liberal Intolerance Is Wrecking My Family
Infanticide Will Be The Law Of The Land If Democrats Win In 2020
See The Violence Inherent In The Leftism
THE BLOOMBERG SYNDROME: Leftists Virtue Pose While Their Cities Die
Illegal Alien Invasion Part Of Left’s Plan To Control Electoral College